Proposed EU migration deal needs to be improved, German minister says

EU countries could reach an agreement on a migration deal on Thursday, but the proposed compromise needs to be improved, Germany's Interior Minister Nancy Faeser said before a meeting with ministers from the EU bloc.

"The compromise on the table is very difficult for Germany," Faeser said. "I feel there is a common understanding which could lead to an agreement, but not at any price." 

European Union countries are expected to agree on how to share out the responsibility of hosting refugees and migrants, a top EU official said on Tuesday of what would mark a breakthrough after years of bitter feuds within the bloc.

The EU's migration chief spoke ahead of talks between home affairs ministers of the bloc's 27 member states on Thursday.

On the table is an overhaul of EU asylum rules which broke down in 2015 as more than a million people - mostly fleeing the war in Syria - reached the bloc across the Mediterranean.

"It's about having a European migration policy," EU migration commissioner, Ylva Johansson told reporters. "When we work together, we are so strong... This is not a zero-sum game. It's not about winners and losers."

"If we agree on a common approach to managing migration in a humane but restrictive way together, we would all be winners because we will be able to manage migration together in an orderly way."

Agreeing a joint approach has proven all but impossible for EU countries since 2015 when the sea arrivals caught them by surprise, overwhelming their reception and security capacity.

Ever since, countries of arrival like Spain, Italy, Malta and Greece have demanded more help from EU peers. The rich destination countries like Germany, France and Sweden have said they cannot be the only places where the new arrivals end up.

Bad blood spilled over as eastern EU countries like Poland and Hungary refused to host any refugees and migrants from the mainly-Muslim Middle East and North Africa.

The EU has since stepped up efforts to keep people away, with U.N. data showing fewer than 160,000 people made it across the Mediterranean last year. Nearly 2,500 died or went missing on the dangerous voyage.

But the bloc has so far failed to agree on how to share out the responsibility of caring for those who make it, differences playing out prominently as right-wing and populist parties fuelled the debate with anti-immigration rhetoric.

Winners and losers

At the heart of the dispute is whether all EU countries would have to host people - as long demanded by the south and the west - or would eastern states be allowed to offer money or personnel instead of taking in refugees.

Johansson said the tentative deal allowed for the latter, adding that it envisaged no "mandatory relocations" of people and that EU states could help differently.

"I actually foresee we will find a compromise along those lines," she said.

She also warned those reluctant had no veto in the majority vote, and cautioned against taking tough lines on migration for domestic political purposes.

"Without an agreement, we are all losers," she said. "With an agreement, we are actually all winners, including the migrants, because when we work together, we can also welcome migrants and refugees in a more orderly way without risking their lives."

Charity Oxfam criticised the plan, saying it would perpetuate the EU's failed approach which had produced overcrowded and inadequate migration camps on the edges of Europe.

"These proposals will not fix the chronic deficiencies in the EU asylum system. Instead, they signal the EU's desire to barricade Europe from asylum-seekers," it said.

(Reuters)