Burkini bans call French ideas of tolerance into question
In-depth: France's burkini bans have sparked outrage in the UK, which is understood to have a more multicultural approach to integration.
4 min read
Many commentators in the UK and beyond are confused at the French ban [Getty]
The ban on the burkini swimsuit on some French beaches has triggered outrage around the world, not least in Britain, where outlawing religion-oriented clothing is seen as hampering integration.
Newspaper commentators have condemned the ban as an absurdity, and one questioned how a burkini could be more offensive than a "middle-aged bum crack" bursting out from traditional Western beachwear.
The debate raises questions about the French one-size-fits-all model of integration.
In Britain, the full-face veil is not an uncommon sight in towns and city districts with large Muslim populations, but does not seem to stir as strong a reaction as in France.
One of the world's most secular countries, France strongly separates religion and public life and defenders of the ban say a common arena without religious connotations helps avoid sectarian conflicts and encourages equality.
As a result, the burkini – like the burqa before it – has come under fire in France. Some deem it a garment that channels radical Islam and oppresses women.
"It is the expression of a political project, a counter-society, based notably on the enslavement of women," French Prime Minister Manuel Valls said of the burkini on Wednesday.
Former president Nicolas Sarkozy, eyeing a return to the limelight with a new bid for high office, called the swimsuit "a provocation" that supported "radical Islam".
"We don't imprison women behind fabric," he said.
Such views are widely contested in Britain, both on the grounds of tolerance and practicality. In Scotland, the hijab has this week been officially made part of the uniform options available to police.
And Britain's best-known example of burkini-wearing was not by a Muslim but by TV chef Nigella Lawson, who hit the headlines in 2011 when she wore a black version on Bondi Beach in Sydney.
'Wetsuit demonisation'
A BBC report found women in Britain speaking in favour of the burkini and saying it aided integration.
"The burkini allows me the freedom to swim and go on the beach, and I don't feel I am compromising my beliefs for that," Aysha Ziauddin told the broadcaster.
Maryam Ouiles added: "It's outrageous that you would effectively be asked to uncover some flesh or leave... People are always complaining that Muslims should integrate more, but when we join you for a swim that's not right either."
Commentator David Aaronovitch, writing in The Times newspaper, said only "warped minds" would impose a burkini ban.
"The idea that full-length clothing provokes attacks on the wearer, as the French suggest, displays a poisonous logic," he said.
No problems were solved by this "French absurdity", only new ones created, he wrote.
Remona Aly, the communications director at the Exploring Islam Foundation, produced a list of "five reasons to wear a burkini – and not just to annoy the French".
"Nothing says 'losing the plot' to me more than demonising what is, let's face it, a wetsuit," she wrote in The Guardian.
"Is full-piece swimwear really more offensive than seeing a middle-aged bum crack?"
Assimilation v multiculturalism
Sara Silvestri, who specialises in religion and politics at City University London, said France's approach to integration was one of assimilation, whereas Britain had encouraged multiculturalism.
Neither country could claim success, she said.
"Both models of integration are in crisis: they are no longer applied or understood in a clear-cut manner, and both countries are looking at each other to learn lessons and potentially modify the way in which they deal with minorities," she told AFP.
Patrick Simon, an international migration and minorities expert at the French Institute for Demographic Studies, said the burkini debate was driving the impression that minorities, rather than the structure of French society, were the problem.
"There is a difficulty in the French integration model in accepting cultural and religious practices in the public domain," he told AFP.
Recent attacks bolstered the notion that diversity could threaten national cohesion, he said.
"The state discourse has gone from one of tolerance to one of exclusion regarding one section of society."
In the United States, the ban is being seen as illogical –imposing rules to stop women having to obey rules.
The ban is about more than religion or clothing, Amanda Taub wrote in The New York Times newspaper. It is about "protecting France's non-Muslim majority from having to confront a changing world".
The burkini was invented about a decade ago by Australian designer Aheda Zanetti, who spotted a gap in the market for Islamic sportswear.
Zanetti told AFP she was frustrated that the word now had negative connotations.
French politicians "symbolise it as an Islamic term in a bad way when it's really just a word", she said.
Newspaper commentators have condemned the ban as an absurdity, and one questioned how a burkini could be more offensive than a "middle-aged bum crack" bursting out from traditional Western beachwear.
The debate raises questions about the French one-size-fits-all model of integration.
In Britain, the full-face veil is not an uncommon sight in towns and city districts with large Muslim populations, but does not seem to stir as strong a reaction as in France.
One of the world's most secular countries, France strongly separates religion and public life and defenders of the ban say a common arena without religious connotations helps avoid sectarian conflicts and encourages equality.
As a result, the burkini – like the burqa before it – has come under fire in France. Some deem it a garment that channels radical Islam and oppresses women.
"It is the expression of a political project, a counter-society, based notably on the enslavement of women," French Prime Minister Manuel Valls said of the burkini on Wednesday.
Former president Nicolas Sarkozy, eyeing a return to the limelight with a new bid for high office, called the swimsuit "a provocation" that supported "radical Islam".
"We don't imprison women behind fabric," he said.
Such views are widely contested in Britain, both on the grounds of tolerance and practicality. In Scotland, the hijab has this week been officially made part of the uniform options available to police.
And Britain's best-known example of burkini-wearing was not by a Muslim but by TV chef Nigella Lawson, who hit the headlines in 2011 when she wore a black version on Bondi Beach in Sydney.
'Wetsuit demonisation'
A BBC report found women in Britain speaking in favour of the burkini and saying it aided integration.
 |
It's outrageous that you would effectively be asked to uncover some flesh or leave |  |
Maryam Ouiles added: "It's outrageous that you would effectively be asked to uncover some flesh or leave... People are always complaining that Muslims should integrate more, but when we join you for a swim that's not right either."
Commentator David Aaronovitch, writing in The Times newspaper, said only "warped minds" would impose a burkini ban.
"The idea that full-length clothing provokes attacks on the wearer, as the French suggest, displays a poisonous logic," he said.
No problems were solved by this "French absurdity", only new ones created, he wrote.
Remona Aly, the communications director at the Exploring Islam Foundation, produced a list of "five reasons to wear a burkini – and not just to annoy the French".
"Nothing says 'losing the plot' to me more than demonising what is, let's face it, a wetsuit," she wrote in The Guardian.
"Is full-piece swimwear really more offensive than seeing a middle-aged bum crack?"
Assimilation v multiculturalism
Sara Silvestri, who specialises in religion and politics at City University London, said France's approach to integration was one of assimilation, whereas Britain had encouraged multiculturalism.
Neither country could claim success, she said.
"Both models of integration are in crisis: they are no longer applied or understood in a clear-cut manner, and both countries are looking at each other to learn lessons and potentially modify the way in which they deal with minorities," she told AFP.
|
Is full-piece swimwear really more offensive than seeing a middle-aged bum crack? | |
"There is a difficulty in the French integration model in accepting cultural and religious practices in the public domain," he told AFP.
Recent attacks bolstered the notion that diversity could threaten national cohesion, he said.
"The state discourse has gone from one of tolerance to one of exclusion regarding one section of society."
In the United States, the ban is being seen as illogical –imposing rules to stop women having to obey rules.
The ban is about more than religion or clothing, Amanda Taub wrote in The New York Times newspaper. It is about "protecting France's non-Muslim majority from having to confront a changing world".
The burkini was invented about a decade ago by Australian designer Aheda Zanetti, who spotted a gap in the market for Islamic sportswear.
Zanetti told AFP she was frustrated that the word now had negative connotations.
French politicians "symbolise it as an Islamic term in a bad way when it's really just a word", she said.
Follow the Middle East's top stories in English at The New Arab on Google News
More In Analysis
